Henryk Broder, Thilo Sarrazin, Hellmuth Karasek and Ali Kizilkaya Discussions at the LSE in London. About integration in Germany. The fact that no balanced discussion would be was to be expected. That publicly insulted and Protestants desert would, it would be before the auditorium almost came to a fight, probably not you. Friedrich, who studies with me, said he had then just ashamed for his country. And hardly any of my friends and acquaintances from England, Canada, the U.S. could understand, what "intellectual" because we hold in Germany.
Kizilkaya seems most reasonable to have spoken. One must "accept otherness" and many of the problems they had with "Turks" in Germany, are layers problem and not cultural or religious nature - so far so unspectacular. The comment that they wanted with the Islam Conference a "Islam in order" make up was almost revolutionary as well.
also Broder was nothing really surprising. Germany's attitude towards Islam is "appeasement" (Of course), migration is in itself a problem, but Islam (yes), what you see from the fact that there would be with Persians and Alevis no problems (what a differentiated view of things, I'm impressed).
And Sarrazin drove the rail, you're just so accustomed to him, Germany is changing, that would be normal, but at this change is no good (where the man lives?).
We note:
(1) to compilation of Podiumsgaeste: Well, yes. Balance is different. One would have one of them, or invite Broder Sarrazin can - and then to someone who can both really good counter. And someone who knows what of migration in Germany, would have not only Turks, invited a Muslim, but a representative of another group of migrants. That would have been at least an attempt to get from this intolerable Islam fixation of the German integration debate away. In addition, it would have been nice, at least one woman and / or a younger panelists on the panel have to sit. Sarrazin, Broders, Karasek, Kizilkayas Germany - that is not our Germany.
(2) Broder played on the lowest league. On his blog he howled, the LSE had "chickened out" and called off the event out of cowardice, while last year, but had no problem to invite Gaddafi. Qaddafi has spoken Videouebertragung by the LSE, on as a number of foreign leadership has periodically. As an example, would have the good Mr. Broder then perhaps you would prefer the presentation of the publisher of the Arab newspaper Al-Quds al-Arabi, Abdel Bari Atwan, who was known for his controversial statements to mention Hamas, are planned. After protests and lot ' Turmoil during the event was canceled the second part of the talk for security reasons. Just like this time Once the HAMASis your turn, once the Islamopaniker - what has this to do with cowardice or blind eye to the Muslim, as Broder assumed?
(3) And why Broder that is abusive accosted, and those who are not in conformity with it, almost on the nose skin, why should be so much better than the testoterongetriebenen adolescents with German Arabic-or - Turkish origin in Germany's cities, about which the good is so fond of complaining - which I have yet to even declare a.
(3) only hope: That the old, self-righteous Men surrender soon. Your Germany is not our Germany. And when someone like Hellmuth Karasek is happy "to be old" to "the worst" what Germany is imminent, yet to experience, then does the man I'm sorry. What Berlin would be without his German-Turkish bakeries, where you simit and Kaiserbroetchen can buy, what London would be without its Indian restaurants where taste the food almost better than in India, or Munich without its Italian restos in which anyway are almost only Indians in the kitchen? What would we do without Wladimir Kaminer, without Rafik Shami, Herta Mueller, Fatih Akin?
0 comments:
Post a Comment